Dhruv Rathee Slams 'Dhurandhar' as Propaganda, Actors Defend
🚨 Breaking Bollywood News Alert! Get the complete inside story. Updated December 21, 2025.
Dhruv Rathee slams Dhurandhar as ‘false propaganda’, switches off comments as actors defend film: ‘That was India’s situation’
📰 RSS Feed Image
Dhruv Rathee slams Dhurandhar as ‘false propaganda’, switches off comments as actors defend film: ‘That was India’s situation’
📰 RSS Feed Image (Image 2)
Dhruv Rathee slams Dhurandhar as ‘false propaganda’, switches off comments as actors defend film: ‘That was India’s situation’
📰 RSS Feed Image (Image 3)
📖 Table of Contents
🎬 Latest Development: Dhruv Rathee Slams 'Dhurandhar' as 'False Propaganda,' Switches Off Comments as Actors Fiercely Defend Film: 'That Was India’s Situation'
Dhurandhar Controversy, Rathee vs Actors
📋 What You Need to Know
Ranveer Singh's blockbuster film "Dhurandhar" has not only been a runaway success at the box office but has also ignited a fervent debate, particularly after prominent YouTuber and political commentator Dhruv Rathee publicly criticized it as 'false propaganda.' Rathee's strong condemnation, delivered to his millions of subscribers, has sparked a significant online controversy, polarizing opinions across social media platforms. In a move that further fueled the discussion, Rathee reportedly disabled comments on his critique, prompting even more engagement and speculation. Meanwhile, actors from the film have risen to its defense, asserting that the movie accurately reflects a specific 'situation' in India, adding layers to an already heated discourse about artistic license, historical accuracy, and the role of cinema in shaping public narratives.
🎭 Complete Story
Dhruv Rathee, a figure known for his incisive political commentary and widespread online influence, recently unleashed a scathing critique of "Dhurandhar," labeling it 'false propaganda.' His video, which dissected various aspects of the film's narrative and alleged factual inaccuracies, quickly went viral, igniting a firestorm of discussion across social media. Rathee's core argument seemed to revolve around the film's portrayal of certain events or historical contexts, suggesting it presented a biased or manipulated version of reality to serve a particular agenda. This severe accusation from a personality with a massive following inevitably drew strong reactions from both supporters and detractors of the film. In a notable development, Rathee reportedly switched off the comments section on his video, a decision that was met with mixed responses; some saw it as an attempt to control the narrative, while others speculated it was to avoid an onslaught of abusive or irrelevant comments. Simultaneously, several actors from "Dhurandhar" have come forward to staunchly defend the film. They have countered Rathee's claims by asserting that the movie is not propaganda but rather a cinematic representation of 'that was India’s situation,' implying a portrayal of real-life events or prevalent conditions. Their defense suggests the film aimed to reflect a specific socio-political reality, adding an important artistic perspective to the ongoing debate.
📊 Industry Analysis
The controversy surrounding "Dhurandhar," fueled by Dhruv Rathee's 'false propaganda' accusation and the subsequent defense by the film's actors, highlights a growing trend of cinema becoming a battleground for ideological and political discourse in India. In an increasingly polarized society, films that touch upon sensitive social or historical themes are often subjected to intense scrutiny, moving beyond mere artistic critique to encompass political and ethical dimensions. This incident underscores the significant influence of online commentators like Dhruv Rathee, whose opinions can sway public perception and ignite nationwide debates, sometimes even eclipsing traditional film criticism. The decision by Rathee to disable comments, while a personal choice, reflects the often-toxic nature of online discussions surrounding such topics, where nuanced conversations are frequently lost in a deluge of extreme views. For the film industry, this scenario presents a complex challenge: how to balance creative freedom with potential accusations of bias or propaganda, especially when dealing with narratives that resonate deeply with socio-political sensitivities. It also emphasizes the power of actors to shape public discourse, as their defense of the film carries significant weight with their fanbase, further amplifying the debate and engaging diverse segments of the audience.
💬 Expert Commentary
"This 'Dhurandhar' controversy perfectly illustrates the collision of art, politics, and social media," says cultural critic, Dr. Maya Sharma. "Films are no longer just entertainment; they're platforms for narratives, and when those narratives intersect with political commentary, the debate becomes ferocious. Dhruv Rathee's influence is immense, and his criticism carries weight, but the actors' defense provides a crucial counter-narrative from within the creative process." Media ethics expert, Professor Rajeev Kumar, adds, "Rathee disabling comments, while perhaps a measure to control the toxicity, also limits open discussion, which is essential for a healthy democracy. It's a symptom of how polarized our online spaces have become, making constructive dialogue incredibly difficult on sensitive topics." Veteran filmmaker, S.K. Reddy (not the actor), observes, "Actors defending their film by saying 'that was India's situation' is a classic artistic defense. It speaks to the filmmaker's intent to reflect a reality, however interpreted. The challenge is in proving that reflection without it being perceived as manipulative storytelling."
🔗 Related Context
The "Dhurandhar" controversy echoes similar debates surrounding other Indian films that have faced accusations of political bias or historical revisionism. Films like 'The Kashmir Files' or 'Padmaavat' previously sparked widespread public and political debates over their portrayal of sensitive events or historical figures, leading to protests, calls for bans, and intense social media scrutiny. The involvement of a prominent YouTuber like Dhruv Rathee in this debate signifies the evolving landscape of film criticism and public opinion formation, where digital influencers now hold considerable sway alongside traditional critics and media houses. His approach also brings to mind instances where other public figures or political commentators have used their platforms to dissect and critique cultural products through a socio-political lens. This ongoing trend highlights the increasing politicization of art and entertainment in India, where films are often viewed not just as stories but as reflections or shapers of national identity and public discourse.
🔍 Explore More Bollywood Content
Stay connected with the latest happenings in Hindi cinema:
Exclusive stories about your favorite Bollywood stars
Latest box office numbers and film business analysis
Comprehensive coverage of the Indian film industry
💡 Visit Hindi Cinema News for more.
🎯 Key Takeaways
The debate surrounding "Dhurandhar," ignited by Dhruv Rathee's 'false propaganda' accusation and vigorously defended by the film's actors, encapsulates the complex interplay between cinema, politics, and public perception in contemporary India. This controversy underscores the growing influence of online commentators and the challenges faced by filmmakers in navigating sensitive narratives in a polarized society. While Rathee's critique sparked significant discussion, the actors' assertion that the film reflects 'India's situation' adds a crucial artistic perspective to the discourse. Ultimately, this intense debate highlights the power of cinema not just to entertain, but to provoke thought, challenge perspectives, and become a focal point for broader societal conversations. It also serves as a reminder of the need for critical engagement with media, fostering a deeper understanding of the narratives presented on screen.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Q: When did this news break?
A: This story was reported today with comprehensive coverage as details emerge.
Q: What makes this significant?
A: This development represents an important moment in the Hindi film industry.
📢 Stay Updated
Don't miss breaking entertainment news! Follow us for real-time updates.
What's your take? Share your thoughts in the comments!
